<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Script Critics &#187; Promotion Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/tag/promotion-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com</link>
	<description>Affiliate Scripts, WordPress Plugins, and Software Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO SpyGlass</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/seo-spyglass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/seo-spyglass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Building Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO SpyGlass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO SpyGlass is a program that intends to help sites rank higher by spying on the sites that rank highest for a specific keyword.  You can also enter a specific website that you want to rank higher than with your site.  The program will research all aspects of the entered keyword or website, then present [...]<p><a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/seo-spyglass/">SEO SpyGlass</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com">Script Critics</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO SpyGlass is a program that intends to help sites rank higher by spying on the sites that rank highest for a specific keyword.  You can also enter a specific website that you want to rank higher than with your site.  The program will research all aspects of the entered keyword or website, then present you with a set of instructions (called, &#8220;SEO Success Blueprint) tailored just for you.  According to the program, if you follow every step of your blueprint, then you will outrank your competition.</p>
<p>There is no doubt in my mind that this software is highly complicated.  I am sure that it would take me hours, if not days, to do on my own in what this program tries to do in minutes.  Unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations.</p>
<p>First, let me say that I really wanted this program to work.  If it did, it would be a huge timesaver, AND it would help me bring more traffic to my sites.  Who doesn&#8217;t want that?  Traffic typically means money earned.</p>
<p>Before using SEO SpyGlass, I read the instructions.  I followed them and generated my first report.  As I reviewed the seven steps my blueprint had given me, I was a bit confused about some of the steps.</p>
<p>So, I went back to the instructions to see if I had done something wrong.  Nope, I hadn&#8217;t missed anything.</p>
<p>Then I tried a different keyword phrase.  Things did not get better.  I tried five different searches, all with less than desirable results, which I will explain below.</p>
<p>I am not going to share the specific results I did that pertain to my own websites.  However, my final search with this program was made just for this review.  I searched on the highly competitive phrase, &#8220;Dog Training.&#8221;  I do not have a dog training site, but if I did, or if I wanted to start one (which I don&#8217;t), then I should be able to follow the seven steps and outrank any site, according to SEO SpyGlass.</p>
<p><strong>Step One</strong> &#8211; How to properly optimize your anchor text</p>
<p>This is where I am given five specific anchor text keywords that I need to use when linking back to my dog training site.  (Anchor text is the word that is seen when a link is used, such as for <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com">Script Critics</a>.)  According to SEO SpyGlass, the top five phrases I need to use to outrank my competition in search engines are:</p>
<ol>
<li>dog training basics</li>
<li>dog training basics home page</li>
<li>dog training basics &#8211; articles</li>
<li>dog training basics.com</li>
<li>This is a word that appears to be in Chinese, or some other Asian language, which I am unable to copy and paste here</li>
</ol>
<p>Why am I going to use the phrase &#8216;dog training basics&#8217; in the four given versions, if I am trying to rank for the phrase &#8216;dog training?&#8217;  Perhaps there is a reason that I simply do not understand, but the reasoning is not explained to me.  And, why was a phrase given in a foreign language?  I chose the USA as my search engine country, so this just baffles me.</p>
<p>Under this list is a list of the top ten individual anchor text keywords I should use:</p>
<ol>
<li>training</li>
<li>dog</li>
<li>basics</li>
<li>www</li>
<li>dogtrainingbasics</li>
<li>http</li>
<li>htm</li>
<li>articles</li>
<li>home</li>
<li>page</li>
</ol>
<p>Really?  I&#8217;m going to outrank my competitors of dog training sites by using the phrases, &#8220;www,&#8221; &#8220;http,&#8221; &#8220;htm,&#8221; &#8220;articles,&#8221; &#8220;home,&#8221; and &#8220;page?&#8221;  In truth, only three of the ten terms are relevant.</p>
<p><strong>Step Two</strong> &#8211; Increasing your site&#8217;s importance with Google</p>
<p>This step looks increase my site&#8217;s Page Rank (PR) with Google.  To do this, the program tells me what sites I need to get backlinks from.  Backlinks are links from someone else&#8217;s site to my site, and they should use relevant anchor text to be most effective.  The best type of backlinks are from sites that are similar to your site.  So, if I am trying to rank for &#8216;dog training,&#8217; then the best backlinks for my site will come from high PR ranking sites that are also about dog training, or at least about dogs.</p>
<p>There are 20 domains that I am told I need to get backlinks from.  The program even tells me exactly what pages on each domain I should get the backlinks on to increase my Page Rank the most.  Here are the exact top 20 pages I am told I need to get backlinks from to increase my site from the following, in order of importance:</p>
<ol>
<li>http://us.geocities.com/hdhava/ (relevant, but no method for getting a backlink on this page)</li>
<li>http://www.geocities.com/swhdaphne/DogTraining.html (relevant, but no method for getting a backlink on this page)</li>
<li>http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=1006042433001 (relevant, but no method for getting a backlink on this page, as the question is closed to new answers)</li>
<li>http://dir.yahoo.com/Science/Biology/Zoology/Animals__Insects__and_Pets/Mammals/Dogs/Training_and_Obedience/ (relevant, and I could potentially get my site on this page)</li>
<li>http://www.dmoz.org/Recreation/Pets/Dogs/Training/ (relevant, and I could potentially get my site on this page)</li>
<li>http://www.squidoo.com/heateddoghouses (relevant, but highly unlikely that I could get a link on this site)</li>
<li>http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/search.aspx?q=dog+trainig (I was presented with the following error message on this page, &#8220;Searched for &#8216;dog trainig&#8217; No results were found in your search in Encarta.&#8221;, which does not help me)</li>
<li>http://kids.yahoo.com/ask_earl/691543 (relevant, but no method for getting a backlink on this page)</li>
</ol>
<p>Well, I was going to provide the entire 20 sites, but SEO SpyGlass stopped going to the links.  This is one of the problems I&#8217;ve noticed as I&#8217;ve used it.  For some reason, all links stop working.  This is true of external links, such as the ones above, as well as links within the program, such as from one step to the other.  I then have to save my search, close the program, and reopen it to get the links working again.  Highly frustrating!  So, you just get the see the top eight sites.</p>
<p>On the other searches I made, some of the pages I was told to get backlinks from were not only impossible, but also completely unrelated to my site&#8217;s niche.  For example, one page I was told to get a backlink from was an ended eBay auction that had nothing to do with my site.</p>
<p>First, it was completely irrelevant, so I don&#8217;t know why I would even want to get a backlink, assuming I could.  More importantly, it was impossible to get a backlink from the page, as with many of the above examples, because there is simply no way to do so!</p>
<p>Excuse me while I restart the program so I can finish my SEO SpyGlass review&#8230;</p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m back.</p>
<p>Before I leave Step Two, I would like to note that, of the eight pages listed above, only two of the pages were ones I might be able to get backlinks from.  That&#8217;s a terrible ratio of good sites to bad.</p>
<p><strong>Step Three</strong> &#8211; Finding high-quality link partners and getting more link love</p>
<p>This step is about finding other websites to exchange links with.  This means I put a link to Bob&#8217;s site on my site, and Bob puts a link to my site on his site.  As with backlinks (which these technically are, but in this case I am also putting links to other sites on my site, which I would not do in Step Two), I will benefit most from exchanging links with sites similar to mine, such as other dog training sites, or dog sites.</p>
<p>The program gave me eight sites that, it says, I need to get links from.  It must be these exact pages:</p>
<ol>
<li>http://www.talewaggers.com/pup_in_the_house.html (this site no longer exists)</li>
<li>http://www.zimfamilycockers.com/potty.html (relevant, and it may be possible to get a link from this page)</li>
<li>http://www.dnet.net/wcdfa/ (relevant, and it may be possible to get a link from this page)</li>
<li>http://www.paw-rescue.org/before.html (relevant, and it may be possible to get a link from this page, though it looks very difficult)</li>
<li>http://www.petcareservice.net/index.htm (relevant, but no backlinks on this page)</li>
<li>http://www.ombr.org/adoptioninfo2.html (relevant, but no backlinks on this page)</li>
<li>http://precious-puppies4u.tripod.com/ (relevant, and it may be possible to get a link from this page)</li>
<li>http://www.kidsites.com/sites-edu/animals.htm  (relevant, and it may be possible to get a link from this page)</li>
</ol>
<p>So, of the eight pages, I may be able to exchange links with only five of these pages, though one looks to be very difficult.  Not as bad as the results for Step Two, but also not great, given that the program said I need to exchange links with ALL of these pages.</p>
<p>Oh, look at that.  The links stopped working again.  I&#8217;m off to close it and open it for the second time during this review.</p>
<p><strong>Step Four</strong> &#8211; Using articles and press releases for high-quality links and publicity</p>
<p>This step provides me with a list of 160 article directories I should submit articles to.  Of course, they should include anchor text keywords back to my site to be effective.  This is pretty straight forward, and looks like good information.</p>
<p>Also included are 96 press release sites that I should submit press releases to.  As with articles, I would need to include anchor text keywords back to my site.  Again, this looks like good information.</p>
<p><strong>Step Five</strong> &#8211; Unleashing your competitor&#8217;s biggest traffic sources</p>
<p>This step is about learning which sites send traffic to my competitors sites.  It is another list of pages that I need to get links from.  I am not going to list these sites, as there are 43 specific pages.  The pages do look like I could get backlinks from them, so that is good.</p>
<p><strong>Step Six</strong> &#8211; Tapping into social media to get traffic and links</p>
<p>This step is about using social media sites for bringing traffic to my site.  This is a list that includes 47 specific pages that I need to get links from.  The sites look like they are all relevant, with a good chance to get backlinks from.  That is good.</p>
<p><strong>Step Seven</strong> &#8211; Using Internet directories to boost your rankings</p>
<p>This step is about what directories I need to get my site listed in to improve my site&#8217;s search engine ranking.  It starts with both DMOZ and Yahoo! Directory, then gives a list of 1,447 sites to get listed in.  Yes, you read that correctly, over one thousand directories that I would need to submit to!</p>
<p>The first six steps would be fairly time-intensive if I do as my blueprint states I should do.  My guess is it would take me about a week or so to complete them.  But step seven is massive.  To do this on my own would take months.  I&#8217;m guessing most people outsource this step, as I can&#8217;t imagine taking the time to submit one site to 1,447 directories.  If I did, though, I&#8217;m sure my site would benefit greatly in rank from all the links it would have.</p>
<p>In closing, I really wish this provided better results.  There are far too many irrelevant pages given (there were many more in my private searches than were shown in this example), too many no-longer-existing sites (there was just one in this example, but there were a lot in my private searches), and too many pages that are just impossible to get backlinks from, as there aren&#8217;t any or it can&#8217;t be done (such as eBay auction results).</p>
<p>The results are unreliable for such a pricey program.  That isn&#8217;t to say there is no value to it, as steps five, six, and seven did seem to have valuable information, but I could have gotten the same information on my own with a bit of research.  I cannot recommend this program, unless you decide to use the free version.</p>
<h2>Pros and Cons of SEO SpyGlass</h2>
<div id="procon">
<div id="proconl">
<h4>Pros of SEO SpyGlass</h4>
<ul>
<li>Steps five, six, and seven seem to produce good information</li>
<li>Program works on both Windows and Mac machines</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="proconr">
<h4>Cons of SEO SpyGlass</h4>
<ul>
<li>Links stop working and program needs to be closed and reopened to get them to work again</li>
<li>Results vary wildly in relevance or accuracy, with too many results being completely wrong</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.scriptcritics.com/wp-content/themes/script_critic/images/spacer.gif" alt="spacer" width="550" height="1" /></div>
<h2>About the Developers</h2>
<p>SEO SpyGlass is the creation of www.link-assistant.com.  You will find a suite of software programs, all geared towards helping you build a better site or improving your site&#8217;s search engine ranking.</p>
<h2>Cost and Licensing of SEO SpyGlass</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>One Time Cost: $87 (or, purchase all four SEO programs for $268 and save $20 on each program!)</strong></li>
<li>Research as MANY Websites as you like with a single license!</li>
<li>Free Forum Access!</li>
</ul>
<h4>Read More and Purchase Today!</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/seo-spyglass/">SEO SpyGlass</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com">Script Critics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/seo-spyglass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PLRPro Review</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Website Building Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content and Article Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content and article scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plr membership sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plrpro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plrpro review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[03-18-2010 Edit: PLRPro.com has just completed a complete revamping of their site and product.  The owners have completely changed what they are offering.  Now, you can get up to four components that they offer: Section One: Content (250 unique articles in 25 niches each month) Section Two: Training  (Four-step process to making $4,000 each month) [...]<p><a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/">PLRPro Review</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com">Script Critics</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>03-18-2010 Edit: PLRPro.com has just completed a complete revamping of their site and product.  The owners have completely changed what they are offering.  Now, you can get up to four components that they offer:</em></p>
<p><em>Section One: Content (250 unique articles in 25 niches each month)</em></p>
<p><em>Section Two: Training  (Four-step process to making $4,000 each month)</em></p>
<p><em>Section Three: Site Creation (Create preconfigured affiliate websites using WordPress within five minutes, without any knowledge of how to put up a site)</em></p>
<p><em>Section Four: Traffic Generation (gain additional traffic by getting backlinks using ArticleMarketingAutomation.com)</em></p>
<p><em>I am very impressed with the changes they have made, and MUCH prefer the PLR articles they are now sending members. </em></p>
<p><em>~ Rochelle</em></p>
<p>Writing content for a website can be extemely time-consuming work.  For some, it is even torture!  Finding pre-written articles that you can legally use on your own sites is the perfect answer for many site owners.  This is why many people use PLR articles.</p>
<p>PLR stands for <strong>P</strong>rivate <strong>L</strong>abel <strong>R</strong>ights.  It means, you can use PLR articles in any way you see fit, within the terms of the articles.  The terms vary from source to source, but typically you are allowed to publish the articles and claim them as your own, but you can&#8217;t sell them or give them away.</p>
<p>Enter PLRPro.  PLRPro is one of many PLR membership sites.  For a monthly fee you are given 11 different articles packs, each containing 40 articles, and header graphics that match each pack&#8217;s niche or theme.</p>
<p>You might wonder why you would want to pay the monthly price from just a bunch of articles and graphics.  I once thought that, too.  Truth be told, I was a member of PLR Pro in early 2008, and quit a month later.  The articles were fine, but I didn&#8217;t really know what to do with them.</p>
<p>What a difference a year makes!</p>
<h2>Features of PLR Pro</h2>
<p>In late 2008 I rejoined after finding out they had overhauled the site and added a lot of features (with more to come!).  As of this writing I have been a member for five months and have no plans to quit again.  The changes the site owners made has significantly improved the site for all members.  This PLRPro review is based on my most recent experience with them.</p>
<p>First, you still get the article packs and graphics.  Included with the graphics, for those who have Photoshop, are the .psd versions of the graphics, so you can modify them, if you want.  Or, you can use them as is.  They are high quality headers that can be used without modification.</p>
<p>Newly added to the site is a tool that aims to make various aspects of creating and promoting a site as easy as pressing a button.  The reality of this tool is that there are still bugs to be worked out, which is frustrating at times.  The frustration mostly comes from seeing the potential of this tool, knowing that it can do so much more than it sometimes does.  But when it works properly, it can&#8217;t be beat!</p>
<p>The tool, called the Project Green Button (or PGB), makes creating a new site a super simple process.  Simply enter a few details about the site, choose a theme for the site and your article pack, and the PGB tool builds the site in minutes.  You can also use PGB to edit any page, or add new pages.</p>
<p>There will soon be a modification to PGB that will allow it to make WordPress blogs, which is very exciting!  I prefer to create sites using WordPress, not HTML.</p>
<p>The PGB tool also has several promotional tools.  From within PGB you can launch:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>RSS Submit</strong>.  This will allow you to submit your site&#8217;s RSS feed to several well-known sources.</li>
<li><strong>Social Bookmarking</strong>.  This will allow you to submit your site, or pages within your site, to many well-known sources.</li>
<li><strong>Article Marketing Automation</strong>.  This will allow you to submit articles to the AMA site, to help you gain backlinks to your site.</li>
</ul>
<p>These three tools are incredibly helpful to have.  The services they provide are important for gaining traffic to your sites and getting important backlinks (links from other sites to yours).  Having them as part of PGB is incredibly helpful in that PGB keeps track of your login information, and you can do everything from one location.  This is SO much easier than having to go to each site individually!</p>
<p>PGB does not submit sites to directories.  If you want to do this then you will have to do it on your own or use separate software.</p>
<p>Included in your membership with PLRPro is free access to AMA.  AMA is an amazing resource and will be covered in another review.  I love using AMA and think that this, alone, makes the membership worth it.  Throw in the PGB tool and this is an incredible deal for people who plan on creating multiple sites.</p>
<p>The owners of PLRPro want you to succeed when you join their site.  To accomplish this, they have created a step-by-step blueprint of how to make $2000-$6000 per month within 12 months.  They tell you exactly what to do to achieve this financial goal.</p>
<p>Is the blueprint realistic?  Yes!</p>
<p>There are no difficult steps.  All are easily accomplished.  The most difficult aspect is actually doing them.  And to help you do each step, there is a spreadsheet that you use to track your progress.  The key is to complete each step each week for six months.  You can go beyond six months, but the spreadsheet is only for this length of time.</p>
<p>There were one or two areas that confused me on the spreadsheet.  While I think I know what I&#8217;m supposed to do with them, I was not positive.  Fortunately, there is a great forum for members.  I posted questions about what I was confused about and got answers pretty quickly.</p>
<p>In and of itself, PLRPro is a great program.  However, it is not the end-all, be-all of site creation and promotion.  It is my opinion that this site is a perfect match for <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/crowd-mountain-review/">Crowd Mountain</a>.  What you learn as a member of <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/crowd-mountain-review/">Crowd Mountain</a> will help immensely with your membership to PLRPro.  Among other things, <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/crowd-mountain-review/">Crowd Mountain</a> goes deep into explaining about keyword research, which is glossed over at PLRPro.</p>
<p>While it may be tempting to simply start posting articles on your site, I urge new members to actually watch the tutorial videos and read the written instructions.  Even if you think you know a topic, it is important, as you may have been doing something wrong and not even know it.</p>
<h2>Pros and Cons of PLRPro</h2>
<div id="procon">
<div id="proconl">
<h4>Pros of PLRPro</h4>
<ul>
<li>Excellent content and graphics</li>
<li>Project Green Button tool</li>
<li>Free AMA membership</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="proconr">
<h4>Cons of PLRPro</h4>
<ul>
<li>Cost of membership &#8211; this may be too steep for some people, but it is very much worth the cost</li>
<li>PGB is a bit buggy, but works as it should in most areas</li>
<li>PGB is only available for Windows &#8211; Mac users can only use this if they have Windows installed on their Macs</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.scriptcritics.com/wp-content/themes/script_critic/images/spacer.gif" alt="spacer" width="550" height="1" /></p>
</div>
<h2>About the Developers</h2>
<p>PLRPro is the brain child of Daniel Turner and Marc Lindsay.  Both Daniel and Marc have learned the ropes of site creation and promotion, and are dedicated to helping others achieve the success they now have.  Best of all, Daniel and Marc are accessible to members.  They encourage members to contact them with questions, and they actually answer their emails.  I can vouch for this, as I contacted one of them and got a response within 24 hours.</p>
<h2>Cost and Licensing of PLRPro</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Monthly Cost: $149 </strong>(expected to be raised to $167 soon, then $197, so get locked in at the lower price now!)</li>
<li>Cost includes MORE than 20 Site Themes!</li>
<li>Develop as MANY Websites as you like with your membership!</li>
<li>Free Forum Access for Registered buyers ONLY!</li>
<li>Free Access to the AMA site!</li>
</ul>
<h4>Read More and Join Today!</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/">PLRPro Review</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.scriptcritics.com">Script Critics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
