Comments on: PLRPro Review http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/ Affiliate Scripts, WordPress Plugins, and Software Reviews Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:41:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Mike http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/comment-page-1/#comment-226 Mike Wed, 13 May 2009 17:16:40 +0000 http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=572#comment-226 That's good to hear. When I clear my current backlog I may give them another go. If grammar and the odd typo are the only problems that is a big improvement. Apparently some of their old team of writers was outsourcing the content themselves and returning inferior work which was slipping through quality control. You want to see the garbage I got on hot tubs. It was virtually unreadable! I agree with you on Market Samurai it's an excellent tool. I'm not sure about those SEOTC figures mind following the latest update. That’s good to hear. When I clear my current backlog I may give them another go. If grammar and the odd typo are the only problems that is a big improvement.

Apparently some of their old team of writers was outsourcing the content themselves and returning inferior work which was slipping through quality control. You want to see the garbage I got on hot tubs. It was virtually unreadable!

I agree with you on Market Samurai it’s an excellent tool. I’m not sure about those SEOTC figures mind following the latest update.

]]> By: Rochelle http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/comment-page-1/#comment-221 Rochelle Wed, 13 May 2009 12:44:11 +0000 http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=572#comment-221 @ Mike, Interesting comment. I have had very little problems with the quality of the article packs. I seem to recall reading in their forum that they did hire new writers, but I was unaware that was the reason. The only complaint I can come up with regarding the articles is that there have been a few grammatical or spelling errors. But, it hasn't bothered me because the articles are meant to be rewritten. I just correct them as I rewrite the articles. Other then that, I've been impressed with the quality. I've also been impressed with the keyword research done for each article. I have Market Samurai, which is THE best keyword research tool (IMO), and I have done my own research for several articles. In EVERY instance, the keywords targeted in the articles has been the best keyword or keyword phrase to target. It shows me that they are doing their homework. Rochelle @ Mike,

Interesting comment. I have had very little problems with the quality of the article packs. I seem to recall reading in their forum that they did hire new writers, but I was unaware that was the reason.

The only complaint I can come up with regarding the articles is that there have been a few grammatical or spelling errors. But, it hasn’t bothered me because the articles are meant to be rewritten. I just correct them as I rewrite the articles.

Other then that, I’ve been impressed with the quality. I’ve also been impressed with the keyword research done for each article. I have Market Samurai, which is THE best keyword research tool (IMO), and I have done my own research for several articles. In EVERY instance, the keywords targeted in the articles has been the best keyword or keyword phrase to target. It shows me that they are doing their homework.

Rochelle

]]> By: Mike http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/plrpro/comment-page-1/#comment-220 Mike Tue, 12 May 2009 19:26:41 +0000 http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=572#comment-220 I joined PLR Pro in November 2008 and left the same month. The quality of the articles was abysmal. Mark Ling of affilorama recently offered a bonus pack produced by PLR Pro and again the quality was very poor. The guys were so embarrassed they sacked some of there staff and have rewritten much of it for which I commend them I wonder whether things have improved since then? How are you finding the quality? I joined PLR Pro in November 2008 and left the same month. The quality of the articles was abysmal.

Mark Ling of affilorama recently offered a bonus pack produced by PLR Pro and again the quality was very poor. The guys were so embarrassed they sacked some of there staff and have rewritten much of it for which I commend them

I wonder whether things have improved since then? How are you finding the quality?

]]>