<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orginizer WordPress Plugin Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/orginizer-wordpress-plugin-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/orginizer-wordpress-plugin-review/</link>
	<description>Affiliate Scripts, WordPress Plugins, and Software Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/orginizer-wordpress-plugin-review/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=271#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Mas,

Although I do not have proof one way or the other, I decided not to use this plugin.  That being said, I didn&#039;t have any problems on the site I did install it on.  Hopefully the developer will be able to address any questions or concerns you have.

Rochelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mas,</p>
<p>Although I do not have proof one way or the other, I decided not to use this plugin.  That being said, I didn&#8217;t have any problems on the site I did install it on.  Hopefully the developer will be able to address any questions or concerns you have.</p>
<p>Rochelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/orginizer-wordpress-plugin-review/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=271#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Mark - 

Just thought I would chime in from my experience with it...

I actually thought the same exact thing right after I installed it. To the naked eye, all your content DOES in fact look identical, but if you view the code of the page, you will see that it is actually an encoded Javascript, that reads completely different and unrecognizible by humans.

I went back and forth with the developer a few times myself... thinking the same thing. In the end, it DOES in fact render a different page to search spiders.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; </p>
<p>Just thought I would chime in from my experience with it&#8230;</p>
<p>I actually thought the same exact thing right after I installed it. To the naked eye, all your content DOES in fact look identical, but if you view the code of the page, you will see that it is actually an encoded Javascript, that reads completely different and unrecognizible by humans.</p>
<p>I went back and forth with the developer a few times myself&#8230; thinking the same thing. In the end, it DOES in fact render a different page to search spiders.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAS</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/orginizer-wordpress-plugin-review/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>MAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=271#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Hi Rochelle,

I just bought this plugin and installed it and it has done nothing that I can notice.  Copyscape shows the same dup content after activating as it did before. I have submitted a ticket with them at originizer.com but no response yet.

so far I can not find one single thing this plugin does and for $67 bucks it is the most expensive plugin I have bought.

Do you have anything new to share about it?

Mas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rochelle,</p>
<p>I just bought this plugin and installed it and it has done nothing that I can notice.  Copyscape shows the same dup content after activating as it did before. I have submitted a ticket with them at originizer.com but no response yet.</p>
<p>so far I can not find one single thing this plugin does and for $67 bucks it is the most expensive plugin I have bought.</p>
<p>Do you have anything new to share about it?</p>
<p>Mas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/orginizer-wordpress-plugin-review/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=271#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Cookware - I am on the fence with this plugin.  Someone contacted me about this plugin and said that the way it fools search engines about duplicate content is by converting it to javascript.  I had been under the impression that search engines couldn&#039;t read javascript, but my site using this plugin was indexed and posts did show up when I searched for phrases found in posts on my site while this plugin was activated.

Is there a negative impact?  I do not know.  But I really don&#039;t like the javascript aspect of it.  To tell the truth, it bothers me so much that I deactivated this plugin and am no longer using it.  That doesn&#039;t mean my site was impacted negatively, as it wasn&#039;t, but I do not want to take a chance that it might.

So, it is really up to each user to decide if they are comfortable with what this plugin does and how it does it.

I ope that answers your questions.

Rochelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookware &#8211; I am on the fence with this plugin.  Someone contacted me about this plugin and said that the way it fools search engines about duplicate content is by converting it to javascript.  I had been under the impression that search engines couldn&#8217;t read javascript, but my site using this plugin was indexed and posts did show up when I searched for phrases found in posts on my site while this plugin was activated.</p>
<p>Is there a negative impact?  I do not know.  But I really don&#8217;t like the javascript aspect of it.  To tell the truth, it bothers me so much that I deactivated this plugin and am no longer using it.  That doesn&#8217;t mean my site was impacted negatively, as it wasn&#8217;t, but I do not want to take a chance that it might.</p>
<p>So, it is really up to each user to decide if they are comfortable with what this plugin does and how it does it.</p>
<p>I ope that answers your questions.</p>
<p>Rochelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookware</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/orginizer-wordpress-plugin-review/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=271#comment-144</guid>
		<description>So how does this plugin work for you? Have you found any negative impact from using it? How does it make your content original?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how does this plugin work for you? Have you found any negative impact from using it? How does it make your content original?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
