<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Backlinks with Comment Hut Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/getting-backlinks-with-comment-hut-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/getting-backlinks-with-comment-hut-review/</link>
	<description>Affiliate Scripts, WordPress Plugins, and Software Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/getting-backlinks-with-comment-hut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=150#comment-171</guid>
		<description>@Bart

You are right about not wanting all &#039;dofollow&#039; links.  If you do this, search engines will be on to you and know what you are doing.  

If using Comment Hut is your only method of getting backlinks then having too many &#039;dofollow&#039; links would be a valid concern.  However, if you use this, along with various other methods, you should have a nice balance of &#039;dofollow&#039; and &#039;nofollow&#039; backlinks to your sites.

Rochelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bart</p>
<p>You are right about not wanting all &#8216;dofollow&#8217; links.  If you do this, search engines will be on to you and know what you are doing.  </p>
<p>If using Comment Hut is your only method of getting backlinks then having too many &#8216;dofollow&#8217; links would be a valid concern.  However, if you use this, along with various other methods, you should have a nice balance of &#8216;dofollow&#8217; and &#8216;nofollow&#8217; backlinks to your sites.</p>
<p>Rochelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bart</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/getting-backlinks-with-comment-hut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=150#comment-164</guid>
		<description>As stated by the review, too many dofollow links without any nofollow links may affect your site ranking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated by the review, too many dofollow links without any nofollow links may affect your site ranking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stream</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/getting-backlinks-with-comment-hut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=150#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Its an excellent tool to use, having tried it out myself commenthut provided a significant rise to my page rank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its an excellent tool to use, having tried it out myself commenthut provided a significant rise to my page rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monthly Reviews Roundup - January 2009 &#124; Script Critics</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/getting-backlinks-with-comment-hut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Monthly Reviews Roundup - January 2009 &#124; Script Critics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=150#comment-73</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment Hut Review Posted by Rochelle, Jan 05, 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment Hut Review Posted by Rochelle, Jan 05, 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/getting-backlinks-with-comment-hut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=150#comment-28</guid>
		<description>This program sounds very similar to the Fast Blog Finder tool by G-lock software.

Having the ability to quickly search for blogs in your niche to leave comments on is a real time saver.

I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll work out the minor usability issues.

Great review!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This program sounds very similar to the Fast Blog Finder tool by G-lock software.</p>
<p>Having the ability to quickly search for blogs in your niche to leave comments on is a real time saver.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll work out the minor usability issues.</p>
<p>Great review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
