<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caffeinated Content Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/</link>
	<description>Affiliate Scripts, WordPress Plugins, and Software Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Gary - 

Did you check to make sure you set a &quot;template&quot; on the setup screen, AND to make sure the template file itself is in the caffinatedcontent/templates/ folder?

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary &#8211; </p>
<p>Did you check to make sure you set a &#8220;template&#8221; on the setup screen, AND to make sure the template file itself is in the caffinatedcontent/templates/ folder?</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-323</guid>
		<description>I cannot get CaffeinatedContent to display the articles it fetches. It does everything it is supposed to do except actually display the new content. I get no response from support. So far, the script is useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot get CaffeinatedContent to display the articles it fetches. It does everything it is supposed to do except actually display the new content. I get no response from support. So far, the script is useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;ve been using the Caffeinated Content plugin now for a few years and would highly recommend it to anyone who is seriously considering running multiple Wordpress blogs. This is one of the nicest plugins I have in my toolbox.

Thanks
Joseph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;ve been using the Caffeinated Content plugin now for a few years and would highly recommend it to anyone who is seriously considering running multiple WordPress blogs. This is one of the nicest plugins I have in my toolbox.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caffeinated Content Review &#124; Mammoth Creatives</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Caffeinated Content Review &#124; Mammoth Creatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-318</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: Script Critics    Share this article on twitter...   Related posts:6 Crucial Wordpress Plugins To Improve Your SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: Script Critics    Share this article on twitter&#8230;   Related posts:6 Crucial WordPress Plugins To Improve Your SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-317</guid>
		<description>This message is to all who have had crappy support, or no support at all, with Caffeinated Content.  I just got an email from the author of this plugin stating that he had outsourced about 95% of the workings for his plugin, including tech support.  He said all went well initially, but it slowly fell apart.  He didn&#039;t realize how bad it was until recently, but by now, it was too late to fix the problem.  He is currently working on fixing all that needs to be fixed, including tech support.

So, if you have had a bad experience, you might want to allow him a bit of time, then try again.  He sounded sincere in his email, so I am inclined to believe what he said.  Otherwise, what was the point in his admitting any of this?

Rochelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This message is to all who have had crappy support, or no support at all, with Caffeinated Content.  I just got an email from the author of this plugin stating that he had outsourced about 95% of the workings for his plugin, including tech support.  He said all went well initially, but it slowly fell apart.  He didn&#8217;t realize how bad it was until recently, but by now, it was too late to fix the problem.  He is currently working on fixing all that needs to be fixed, including tech support.</p>
<p>So, if you have had a bad experience, you might want to allow him a bit of time, then try again.  He sounded sincere in his email, so I am inclined to believe what he said.  Otherwise, what was the point in his admitting any of this?</p>
<p>Rochelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Carolyn,

Mark beat me to the answer.  Thanks, Mark!

To add to what Mark said, I actually edited the plain.c.txt file so it shows just:

[answer]


And my plain.p.txt looks like:

[video][post]


So, you can play around with the information that came with these two files until you are satsisfied with the results they provide.

Rochelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carolyn,</p>
<p>Mark beat me to the answer.  Thanks, Mark!</p>
<p>To add to what Mark said, I actually edited the plain.c.txt file so it shows just:</p>
<p>[answer]</p>
<p>And my plain.p.txt looks like:</p>
<p>[video][post]</p>
<p>So, you can play around with the information that came with these two files until you are satsisfied with the results they provide.</p>
<p>Rochelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-304</guid>
		<description>@ Carolyn -

If you open the main CC folder, you will see a subfolder named &quot;templates&quot;, which contains text files of the templates.

I always use the plain.txt file for posts.

The default plain.p.txt looks like:

[who] asked: &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;[video]&lt;br/&gt;[post]&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;[link]

[who] shows the persons name
[video] shows a video
[post] shows the content of the post
[link] shows a link back to cc.

My own file looks like:

[post]

Hope that helps,

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Carolyn -</p>
<p>If you open the main CC folder, you will see a subfolder named &#8220;templates&#8221;, which contains text files of the templates.</p>
<p>I always use the plain.txt file for posts.</p>
<p>The default plain.p.txt looks like:</p>
<p>[who] asked: </p>
<p>[video]<br />[post]</p>
<p>[link]</p>
<p>[who] shows the persons name<br />
[video] shows a video<br />
[post] shows the content of the post<br />
[link] shows a link back to cc.</p>
<p>My own file looks like:</p>
<p>[post]</p>
<p>Hope that helps,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-303</guid>
		<description>I use this plug in. Also a victim of the non-responsive tech support - so I&#039;m wondering if anyone knows how to take control of the default links that link back to Kanseio.com - they keep talking about some template - but I don&#039;t know where to find it - if it can be edited in the wordpress admin area or if this is something to download via ftp, make change and then upload again.

Anyone have the same issue? any resolutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use this plug in. Also a victim of the non-responsive tech support &#8211; so I&#8217;m wondering if anyone knows how to take control of the default links that link back to Kanseio.com &#8211; they keep talking about some template &#8211; but I don&#8217;t know where to find it &#8211; if it can be edited in the wordpress admin area or if this is something to download via ftp, make change and then upload again.</p>
<p>Anyone have the same issue? any resolutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamad</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review. Although I appreciate this software I think it would take me longer to rewrite an article than writing an original one and particularly if I don&#039;t have research the topic. But like Mark mentioned, it is a good idea for providing ideas for future posts. I would like to buy it but not sure. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. Although I appreciate this software I think it would take me longer to rewrite an article than writing an original one and particularly if I don&#8217;t have research the topic. But like Mark mentioned, it is a good idea for providing ideas for future posts. I would like to buy it but not sure. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptcritics.com/2009/caffeinated-content-review/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptcritics.com/?p=332#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Marcus,

I am beginning to agree about the poor technical support.  I have not had a response to my email sent some time ago.

However, I disagree about this being &quot;an expensive tool to plagiarize.&quot;  CC does have the potential to be abused, but if used properly it is an excellent method for gathering ideas for writing your own content.

Rochelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus,</p>
<p>I am beginning to agree about the poor technical support.  I have not had a response to my email sent some time ago.</p>
<p>However, I disagree about this being &#8220;an expensive tool to plagiarize.&#8221;  CC does have the potential to be abused, but if used properly it is an excellent method for gathering ideas for writing your own content.</p>
<p>Rochelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
